{"id":"arxiv/2601.18973","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.18973","tags":["cs.LG","cs.AI","eess.SY","quant-ph"],"score":0,"title":"When Does Adaptation Win? Scaling Laws for Meta-Learning in Quantum Control","domain":"cs.LG","source":"arxiv","authors":["Nima Leclerc","Chris Miller","Nicholas Brawand"],"reviews":0,"subject":"cs.LG","summary":"Quantum hardware suffers from intrinsic device heterogeneity and environmental drift, forcing practitioners to choose between suboptimal non-adaptive controllers or costly per-device recalibration. We derive a scaling law lower bound for meta-learning showing that the adaptation gain (expected fidelity improvement from task-specific gradient steps) saturates exponentially with gradient steps and scales linearly with task variance, providing a quantitative criterion for when adaptation justifies its overhead. Validation on quantum gate calibration shows negligible benefits for low-variance…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"cs","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-01-26","reactions":{}}