{"id":"arxiv/2603.24421","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24421","tags":["stat.ME","math.ST","stat.OT"],"score":0,"title":"E-values as statistical evidence: A comparison to Bayes factors, likelihoods, and p-values","domain":"stat.ME","source":"arxiv","authors":["Ben Chugg","Aaditya Ramdas","Peter Grünwald"],"reviews":0,"subject":"stat.ME","summary":"A recurring debate in the philosophy of statistics concerns what, exactly, should count as a measure of evidence for or against a given hypothesis. P-values, likelihood ratios, and Bayes factors all have their defenders. In this paper we add two additional candidates to this list: the e-value and its sequential analogue, the e-process. E-values enjoy several desirable properties as measures of evidence: they combine naturally across studies, handle composite hypotheses, provide long-run error rates, and admit a useful interpretation as the wealth accrued by a bettor in a game against the…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"stat","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-03-25","reactions":{}}