{"id":"arxiv/2604.14842","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.14842","tags":["eess.SY","math.OC"],"score":0,"title":"Simplification Ad Absurdum? Revisiting Gas Flow Modeling for Integrated Energy System Planning","domain":"eess.SY","source":"arxiv","authors":["Thomas Klatzer","Yannick Werner","Sonja Wogrin"],"reviews":0,"subject":"eess.SY","summary":"This paper analyzes the implications of simplified pipeline gas flow models for integrated energy system planning. A case study of an integrated power-hydrogen expansion planning problem shows that simplifying pressure-flow relationships and gas dynamics can lead to expansion plans that incur substantial regret when evaluated under a more realistic dynamic gas flow model -- due to suboptimal system expansion, operation, and non-supplied hydrogen. Numerical experiments show that planning under the highly simplified transport and transport-linepack models -- commonly used in expansion studies…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"eess","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-04-16","reactions":{}}