{"id":"arxiv/2604.16438","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16438","tags":["q-fin.RM","math.PR","q-fin.MF"],"score":0,"title":"Ranking Metrics: Extending Acceptability and Performance Indexes","domain":"q-fin.RM","source":"arxiv","authors":["Asmerilda Hitaj","Elisa Mastrogiacomo","Ilaria Peri","Marcelo Righi"],"reviews":0,"subject":"q-fin.RM","summary":"This paper develops an axiomatic framework for ranking metrics, a general class of functionals for evaluating and ordering financial or insurance positions. Unlike traditional risk-adjusted performance measures-such as the Sharpe ratio, RAROC, or Omega-that express reward per unit of risk, ranking metrics assign each position a performance level rather than a normalized return. Relying on monotonicity and a new property called cash-quasiconcavity, we derive representation results linking ranking metrics to families of acceptance sets and risk measures, extending the theory of acceptability…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"econ","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-04-06","reactions":{}}