{"id":"arxiv/2606.07169","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07169","tags":["stat.ME","math.ST"],"score":0,"title":"When can a posterior predictive check identify the learning rate? Exact degeneracy in Gaussian models and implications for Generalised Bayesian Inerence","domain":"stat.ME","source":"arxiv","authors":["Nam Anh Le"],"reviews":0,"subject":"stat.ME","summary":"Generalised Bayesian inference tempers the likelihood by a learning rate $η$ to mitigate model misspecification, and the choice of $η$ is consequential. Zafar and Nicholls (2024) proposed selecting $η$ by a posterior predictive check (PPC): one chooses the smallest $η$ at which a log-likelihood PPC $p$-value is not rejected. An exact, finite-sample analysis of this selector on the Gaussian linear model is given. With known variance and a flat prior, the PPC $p$-value equals $P(χ^2_n > \\mathrm{RSS}/σ_0^2)$ for every $η$, so the selector is $η$-invariant; under variance misspecification it is…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"stat","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-06-05","reactions":{}}