{"id":"arxiv/2606.18200","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.18200","tags":["cs.MS","math.NA","physics.comp-ph"],"score":0,"title":"PDECheck: A Diagnostic Software Suite for Auditing Learned PDE Simulators","domain":"cs.MS","source":"arxiv","authors":["Lennon J. Shikhman"],"reviews":0,"subject":"cs.MS","summary":"PDECheck audits learned PDE simulators through callable propagators or saved predictions. It evaluates relative $L^2$ error, temporal composition, finite-difference generators, and equation-specific physical residuals, retaining horizons and missing prerequisites. Analytic and manufactured defects verify the kernels. A heat-equation sweep quantifies generator sensitivity to timestep, frequency, grid, and precision. A three-equation, five-seed FNO study compares supervised, PINO-style, and composition-regularized training. An accuracy-matched advection comparison has state errors below 0.3%…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"cs","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-06-16","reactions":{}}