{"id":"arxiv/2607.17219","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17219","tags":["cs.CL","cs.AI","quant-ph","stat.ME"],"score":0,"title":"Auditing Question-Order Effects in Large Language Models with the QQ Equality: Mechanism Characterization and a Saturation Caveat","domain":"cs.CL","source":"arxiv","authors":["Pilsung Kang"],"reviews":0,"subject":"cs.CL","summary":"Question-order effects in human survey data have been reported to approximately satisfy the QQ (quantum question) equality, a parameter-free prediction of the standard projective quantum question-order model. We develop this equality into an audit framework for sequential binary judgments of autoregressive large language models (LLMs). Theoretically, we characterize mechanism families that satisfy QQ robustly, show that classical repetition can reproduce the equality exactly, and combine QQ with the rank-2 Contextuality-by-Default criterion through $|q_{QQ}| \\le \\mathrm{OSS}$. This separates…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"cs","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-07-19","reactions":{}}