{"id":"arxiv/2608.07979","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07979","tags":["stat.ME","math.ST"],"score":0,"title":"Sparse departures from independence in two-way tables: a heteroscedasticity profile and detection boundary, an adaptive higher-criticism gate, and an assumption-lean exact anchor","domain":"stat.ME","source":"arxiv","authors":["William J. Dwyer"],"reviews":0,"subject":"stat.ME","summary":"Two-way contingency tables are tested for independence throughout applied statistics (genomics, network and text co-occurrence, pharmacovigilance, ecology, survey cross-tabulation), and the routine test reads asymptotic Gaussian tail probabilities off the table cell by cell. On the tables people actually analyze this is badly miscalibrated: across 5,543 real public two-way tables, two-thirds have counts small enough or margins heterogeneous enough that the asymptotic maximum-cell independence scan false-positives at a mean 33% against a 0.05 target, while an exact margin-conditional anchor…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"stat","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-08-08","reactions":{}}