{"id":"arxiv/2608.15617","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15617","tags":["cs.LG","cs.CR","quant-ph","stat.ML"],"score":0,"title":"Benchmarking Quantum Machine Learning for Power-System Attack Detection: Evaluation Choices Decide the Outcome Before the Models Do","domain":"cs.LG","source":"arxiv","authors":["Md Rezwanul Islam"],"reviews":0,"subject":"cs.LG","summary":"Machine-learning detectors for power-system cyberattacks are themselves attack surfaces, and quantum machine learning has been proposed for them. We benchmark fidelity-kernel SVMs and variational classifiers against six tuned classical models on public power-system attack data (Mississippi State/ORNL), across white-box, transfer, decision-based black-box, and poisoning attacks. Our headline finding is methodological: the benchmark's answers are set by the evaluator's choices before the models. Eight choices -- six in the evaluation protocol, two in the tuning the benchmark itself runs --…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"cs","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-08-16","reactions":{}}