{"id":"arxiv/2608.16118","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16118","tags":["cs.AI","math.HO"],"score":0,"title":"Assessing LLMs' mathematical abilities requires understanding the various mechanisms of mathematical creativity","domain":"cs.AI","source":"arxiv","authors":["Silvère Gangloff"],"reviews":0,"subject":"cs.AI","summary":"How should we assess whether large language models can perform mathematical invention? I argue that this question is currently underspecified: mathematical creativity is not one capacity but several mechanistically distinct modes of meaning-making - reflexive introspection on mathematical practice, analogical import from the sciences, problem-driven construction, and the bridging of distant domains - together with a further, cross-cutting distinction between meaning pursued because a pattern was observed and meaning pursued because it is strategically wanted, a distinction I develop through…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"cs","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-08-17","reactions":{}}