{"id":"arxiv/2609.38713","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38713","tags":["quant-ph"],"score":0,"title":"When Error Mitigation Makes Things Worse: Budget-Aware Evaluation, Extrapolation Failure, and the Calibration Trust Boundary","domain":"quant-ph","source":"arxiv","authors":["Guilin Zhang","Kai Zhao","Xiquan Cui","Henry Heng","Xu Chu","Aletta Johanna Blanken"],"reviews":0,"subject":"quant-ph","summary":"Error mitigation is expected to turn noisy quantum measurements into more useful estimates. We show that it can instead amplify error. Under control-offset miscalibration, the evaluated unconstrained zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE) estimators are worse than no mitigation on 38-63% of simulated instances and produce extreme tail errors. A small IBM Heron study finds worsening on 80-88% of 18 instances across two depths, with mean error 3.0-4.1 times the raw error. In simulation, the median changes little, so median-only monitoring misses the failures. We then compare methods at the same online…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"physics","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-09-30","reactions":{}}