{"id":"arxiv/2609.40190","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.40190","tags":["cs.LG","cs.CL","math.ST","stat.ML"],"score":0,"title":"Cheap to Draw, Expensive to Trust: Certifying Test-Time Scaling Curves","domain":"cs.LG","source":"arxiv","authors":["Sohail","Sarkar","Shakuntala Baichoo"],"reviews":0,"subject":"cs.LG","summary":"Sampling several answers and keeping the one a verifier scores highest is one of the simplest ways to buy accuracy at test time. Its effect is reported as a scaling curve: accuracy against the number $k$ of sampled answers. The curve is cheap to draw and expensive to trust. A budget read off it is chosen after looking at every point, so only a band that covers all budgets at once protects the choice, and on a 100-question benchmark a fixed exact-binomial design needs 192,000 generated answers to certify 64 budgets to within $\\pm1/32$ at 95%. Most of that cost pays for the wrong uncertainty.…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"cs","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-09-30","reactions":{}}