{"id":"arxiv/2610.02424","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.02424","tags":["eess.SY","math.OC"],"score":0,"title":"Towards a Theory of Quantitative Vulnerability Analysis for Engineering Systems","domain":"eess.SY","source":"arxiv","authors":["Daniel A. Eisenberg","David L. Alderson"],"reviews":0,"subject":"eess.SY","summary":"Since the 1980s, risk analysis for engineering systems has been defined based on a tuple of scenarios, $\\mathcal{S}$, likelihoods, $L$, and consequences, $C$, where $Risk = (\\mathcal{S},L,C)$. We argue that equating this triplet with risk alone is insufficient and potentially misleading. Instead, we define this tuple as a vulnerability space $\\mathcal{V} = (\\mathcal{S},L,C)$, which becomes risk only when one makes specific interpretations of likelihood and consequence. Here, an interpretation has mathematical meaning, and defines a map that assigns data elements about system vulnerability to…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"eess","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-10-01","reactions":{}}