{"id":"arxiv/2610.08144","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08144","tags":["math.AP","cs.AI","math.LO"],"score":0,"title":"Navier-Stokes lost in translation: Why Lean verification of AI autoformalisation does not guarantee correct natural language proofs","domain":"math.AP","source":"arxiv","authors":["Alexander Bastounis","Fabian Circelli","Anders C. Hansen"],"reviews":0,"subject":"math.AP","summary":"Autoformalisation is increasingly used to verify mathematical texts, including those generated by AI, as in OpenAI's announced proof of blow-up of solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations. In this process, an AI system translates the text from a natural language (NL) into a formal language such as Lean. Once this translation is done, the argument expressed in the formal language can easily be mechanically verified. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate why this process may offer no confidence in the original NL argument, owing to the various difficulties in performing the translation…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"math","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"discusses":[{"id":"web/f2802beee000","title":"On the Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem"}],"published":"2026-10-06","reactions":{}}