{"id":"arxiv/2610.13811","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13811","tags":["cs.LG","cs.CL","quant-ph"],"score":0,"title":"QTestBench: A Test Framework for Evaluating LLM-Generated Quantum Code","domain":"cs.LG","source":"arxiv","authors":["Meriem Terki","Nouhaila Innan","Minghao Shao","Muhammad Kashif","Alberto Marchisio","Muhammad Shafique"],"reviews":0,"subject":"cs.LG","summary":"Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong results in classical code generation and are increasingly used to write the unit tests that safeguard that code. Whether they can do the same for quantum software is less clear, because quantum programs are probabilistic, depend on numerical tolerances, and are judged by domain-specific checkers, so a well-formed test can still disagree with the benchmark's verdict. Existing quantum benchmarks measure whether a model produces a correct solution, but not whether its tests can distinguish correct implementations from faulty ones. We introduce…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"cs","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-10-09","reactions":{}}