{"id":"arxiv/2610.15689","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15689","tags":["stat.ML","cs.LG","math.ST"],"score":0,"title":"When do explicit penalties improve flow matching?","domain":"stat.ML","source":"arxiv","authors":["Lea Kunkel","Alberto González-Sanz","Sophie Langer"],"reviews":0,"subject":"stat.ML","summary":"Flow matching can learn structure directly from data, raising the question of when additional constraints improve generation. We study penalties that encode such constraints, with physics-informed flow matching as a motivating example. Satisfying a constraint more closely need not make the generated distribution more accurate. We therefore compare penalised and unpenalised generative modelling through their expected squared $2$-Wasserstein error. Our analysis covers both vector-valued and functional data in a Hilbert-space setting. We first derive geometric criteria that account for…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"stat","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-10-11","reactions":{}}