{"id":"arxiv/2610.19034","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19034","tags":["quant-ph"],"score":0,"title":"Logical gate set tomography","domain":"quant-ph","source":"arxiv","authors":["Piper C. Wysocki","Juan Gonzalez De Mendoza","Karl Mayer","Natalie C. Brown","Ciaran Ryan-Anderson","Jalan A. Ziyad","Jordan H. Hines","Daniel G. Hothem","Corey I. Ostrove","Timothy J. Proctor","Kevin C. Young","Robin J. Blume-Kohout","Charles H. Baldwin","Kenneth M. Rudinger"],"reviews":0,"subject":"quant-ph","summary":"Quantum error correction (QEC) can strongly suppress noise, but predicting whether a computation succeeds requires understanding not only how much effective noise persists after QEC, but what form that noise takes. To thoroughly characterize this noise, we introduce logical gate set tomography (``logical GST''). Logical GST produces detailed representations of noisy logical operations that can be used to derive higher-level metrics, such as gate fidelity and diamond distance, and to test for non-Markovian and coherent logical errors. We use logical GST to obtain the first full,…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"physics","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-10-13","reactions":{}}