{"id":"arxiv/2610.22397","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22397","tags":["cs.NE","cs.CE","math.OC"],"score":0,"title":"When the implementation matters more than the algorithm: NSGA-II and other multi-objective optimizers in engineering design tools","domain":"cs.NE","source":"arxiv","authors":["Luciano Ambrosini"],"reviews":0,"subject":"cs.NE","summary":"Engineering design tools increasingly embed optimizers as ready-made components that users select by algorithm name, while operator settings and bound, integer and duplicate handling stay fixed inside each tool. This study tests whether the name predicts the result. A tool-agnostic harness exposes one deterministic black box, an emulator of a published 22-variable mixed-integer building-performance problem, to the native optimizers of three Grasshopper plug-ins, to canonical NSGA-II, SMS-EMOA and GDE3 from Python libraries, and to the model-based RBFMOpt. Eighteen configurations were run at…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"cs","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-10-14","reactions":{}}