{"id":"arxiv/2610.38671","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38671","tags":["quant-ph"],"score":0,"title":"Homodyne versus heterodyne detection for classifying families of optical quantum states from finite records of detection events","domain":"quant-ph","source":"arxiv","authors":["Franciszek Grzywa","Sebastian Dolata","Karol Bartkiewicz"],"reviews":0,"subject":"quant-ph","summary":"Neural networks can identify an optical quantum state from an image of its phase-space function, but a real measurement gives a finite record of $N$ detection events. Heterodyne detection samples the Husimi $Q$ function directly, whereas homodyne detection gives the Wigner function only after a reconstruction from several phases. We ask which scheme better identifies one of seven families of states, including Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) states, under loss, dephasing and Gaussian noise. We simulate finite records on identical states for two sets of families, one with equal mean photon…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"physics","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-10-28","reactions":{}}