{"id":"arxiv/2610.40558","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40558","tags":["cs.CR","cs.DC","cs.IT","math.PR"],"score":0,"title":"Power Adjusting Games Under Block-Dependent Pool Payout Schemes","domain":"cs.CR","source":"arxiv","authors":["Mustafa Doger","Sennur Ulukus"],"reviews":0,"subject":"cs.CR","summary":"Advanced power adjusting block withholding attacks such as PAW and T-PAW have been analyzed so far under a global-reset version of the proportional scheme (GRP), which is rarely used in practice. In this paper, we analyze T-PAW, which contains FAW and PAW as special cases, under the block-dependent payout schemes deployed in practice: Pay-Per-Last-N-Shares (PPLNS), round-based Proportional (PROP) and exponential-decay (EXP). We derive the revenue ratios analytically, by renewal arguments for PPLNS and through the stationary carry process of an open round for PROP and EXP. We further…","category":"research","comments":0,"disputed":false,"division":"cs","mentions":0,"discussed":0,"published":"2026-10-29","reactions":{}}