Open Research Index

Oblivious Learning and Collusive Pricing

Yuhang Wu, Assaf Zeevi

arXivarxiv/2606.05363Jun 3, 2026cs.GTscore 0

On a platform with many sellers, should a pricing algorithm explicitly model competitors' prices when learning demand? Classical arguments suggest that ignoring competitors induces model misspecification and inefficiency, yet findings from algorithmic collusion suggest that ignoring competitor prices may, surprisingly, facilitate collusive outcomes and improve profits. We study this problem in a competitive market with unknown noisy demand, in which sellers repeatedly set prices, either incorporating competitor prices in learning their demand models (informed), or ignoring them (oblivious).…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2606.05363
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2606.05363/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2606.05363/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'