Adaptive Runge-Kutta Step Control Buys Training Loss, Not Generalization: An Honest Compute-Matched Study of RK-Adam Optimizers
Interpreting optimizers as gradient-flow discretizations has motivated applying higher-order Runge-Kutta (RK) integrators to neural networks. We build a representative Adam variant (Bogacki-Shampine 3(2) RK pair, FSAL reuse, local-error step control) and evaluate it under a strict compute-matched protocol giving every method the same gradient-evaluation budget - an accounting this literature rarely enforces. Under it the RK variant loses to plain Adam on training loss in both minibatch and full-batch (RK's best-case) training. Instrumenting it shows the "adaptivity" is illusory: normalized…
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2607.14516
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2607.14516/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2607.14516/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'