Grounded verification of chemical and materials reasoning: detection is the bottleneck
Language models are moving into chemistry and materials discovery workflows, where a wrong molecular formula, space group, or formation energy can silently propagate into downstream decisions. These confabulations hide inside fluent reasoning traces and concentrate on rare, long-tail entities, where model confidence is least trustworthy. Retrieving reference data for every prompt would catch them, but at a heavy coverage and abstention cost. We show that deterministic, database-grounded verification catches and repairs these errors selectively, and that the binding constraint is detection…
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2607.17417
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2607.17417/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2607.17417/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'