Open Research Index

Sampling Luck Masquerades as Allocation Gain: Auditing Test-Time Budget Allocation for Neural Combinatorial Optimization

Jinhyung Bae

arXivarxiv/2608.13087Aug 13, 2026cs.LGscore 0

Neural combinatorial optimization (NCO) solvers report the best of many sampled solutions per instance, and the sample count is, by convention, identical for every instance. Whether a non-uniform allocation of a fixed total budget would buy anything has not been measured. We measure it, and we audit the measurement itself. First, on in-distribution workloads the allocation headroom is not detectable. Across three pretrained solvers (POMO, AM, SymNCO) on uniform TSP-100, an oracle allocation computed and evaluated on the same stored samples reports a 2.2-2.6% gain with intervals excluding…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.13087
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.13087/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.13087/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'