Open Research Index

Which Question Is Your Attention Metric Answering? Attention Rows as Compositional Data

Marios Papamichalis, Regina Ruane

arXivarxiv/2608.14712Aug 11, 2026cs.CLscore 0

Each row of a transformer's attention matrix is a probability distribution over tokens, and in trained models most of that probability lands on a single \emph{sink} token, usually the first. Standard tools for comparing attention rows (cosine similarity, Jensen--Shannon divergence, Shannon entropy) therefore hinge on a choice papers rarely report: keep the sink, or drop it and renormalize. This choice can reverse conclusions. On ten pretrained models from five families, 17--47% of verdicts about which of two heads is more similar flip with the convention, and the most prominent structure in…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.14712
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.14712/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.14712/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'