Wrong Operator or Blind Design? A Post-Training Diagnostic for Physics-Informed Coefficient Learning
Physics-informed and hybrid models integrate data and physics, and read learned coefficients as physical. Yet a small prediction error guarantees neither that the postulated operator is right, nor that the design identifies the coefficient, nor that training reached its minimum. On one parabolic benchmark where a sensor aggregates several diffusion rates and the truth is known, a correct operator recovers the coefficient to machine precision. A wrong one leaves it $30\%$ off while the in-domain error is 1.36 times the noise, and drifts $27\%$ across windows. At $7\%$ noise the error falls…
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.16925
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.16925/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2608.16925/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'