Open Research Index

The 11/6 supremum of the Wang-Sitters rounding scheme for graph balancing

Adam Y. Shavit

arXivarxiv/2609.03890Sep 3, 2026cs.DSscore 0

Wang and Sitters' 11/6-approximation for graph balancing (each job allowed on at most two machines) is not one algorithm but a set of permitted executions. Step 1 may return any feasible solution of the fractional relaxation. Step 3 may match remaining jobs to the rounding's slots in many ways. We determine exactly what that latitude permits: ratios arbitrarily close to 11/6, none reaching it, so 11/6 is the least constant bounding every permitted run. We then determine the worst-case guarantee, against the optimum itself, as a function of the big-job threshold beta, the fractional share at…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.03890
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.03890/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.03890/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'