Open Research Index

Optimizing Both Checking and Update Costs in Random Walk Search

Simon Apers, Marin Costes

arXivarxiv/2609.18833Sep 16, 2026cs.DSscore 0

Random walks are a standard tool for search problems in which a state can be updated locally and tested for being marked. When updating the state and checking whether it is marked have different costs, two classical strategies optimize different parts of the cost: checking after every step is optimal in the number of updates, while repeatedly checking only after mixing is optimal in the number of checks. For a single marked state $m$ and a walk started from its stationary distribution $π$, Dohotaru and Høyer stated that both guarantees can be matched simultaneously, for a walk that checks…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.18833
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.18833/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.18833/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'