Open Research Index

Variational objectives for amortized Bayesian inference in inverse problems: The role of posterior conditioning

Abhishek Srivastava, Arijit Hazra, Rajesh Dubbaku

arXivarxiv/2609.25145Sep 21, 2026stat.MLscore 0

Variational autoencoders (VAEs) offer an efficient approach to amortized Bayesian inference for inverse problems, but posterior accuracy can depend strongly on the choice of variational regularization, particularly when the inverse problem contains weakly identified parameter directions. This study investigates three objectives: a reverse Kullback--Leibler formulation (VAE-KL), an asymmetric Jensen--Shannon formulation (VAE-JS), and a Jensen--Shannon--Wasserstein formulation (VAE-JSWA), which replaces the reverse Kullback--Leibler regularizer with the squared 2-Wasserstein distance while…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.25145
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.25145/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.25145/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'