Open Research Index

Benchmarking the Quantum Leap: Auditing LLM Evaluation for Quantum Code Generation

Ethan Seefried, Romit Ghosh, Sharmin Afrose, Nicholas Stapleton, Vicente Layton Ortega, Travis Humble, Tirthankar Ghosal

arXivarxiv/2610.28678Oct 19, 2026cs.SEscore 0

Large language models (LLMs) can generate quantum programs, but reliable evaluation remains difficult because benchmarks differ in task composition, scoring, and failure handling. We evaluate 15 hosted frontier, open-weight, quantum-specialized, and retrieval-augmented models on five quantum code-generation suites (530 tasks), plus 10 models on our new QuantumBenchEval (QBE) benchmark (96 tasks across six topics). We report bootstrap confidence intervals, multiplicity-adjusted paired comparisons, and audits of output validity and evaluator behavior. QiskitHumanEval-Standard approaches…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.28678
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.28678/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.28678/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'