Open Research Index

Active Flux and Polygons: why a stabilisation and how to implement boundary conditions

Remi Abgrall, Yongle Liu

arXivarxiv/2610.34761Oct 26, 2026math.NAscore 0

In a recent paper, the authors developed an Active Flux-type algorithm for polygonal meshes (see \cite{BP_Pampa_VEM}). The main difference between Active Flux methods on polygonal meshes and those on Cartesian or simplex meshes is that the basis functions are not explicitly known. These functions describe the solution using point-value approximations on the polygon boundaries and the average value within the polygons. In \cite{BP_Pampa_VEM}, it was shown that directly transposing the algorithm from simplexes to polygons leads to a mild instability, and a remedy was proposed without a…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.34761
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.34761/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.34761/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'