Open Research Index

Comparing classical and quantum QUBO solvers: optimality, trajectory diagnostics, and limits of solver selection

Gerhard Hellstern, Cedric Schacht, Martin Zaefferer

arXivarxiv/2610.35126Oct 26, 2026quant-phscore 0

Comparing solvers for quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) requires distinguishing solution quality from optimality certification. We compare classical, tensor-network, and fixed-schedule quantum approaches on 180 benchmark instances from ten families with 14-48 variables, supplemented by harder synthetic instances with known optimal solutions, extending to 128 variables. On the main benchmark, a general-purpose branch-and-cut solver matches all reference energies and certifies 176 instances within a 600,s cap. When the known optima are moved to randomly chosen bitstrings, the…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.35126
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.35126/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.35126/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'