Open Research Index

E-values as statistical evidence: A comparison to Bayes factors, likelihoods, and p-values

Ben Chugg, Aaditya Ramdas, Peter Grünwald

arXivarxiv/2603.24421Mar 25, 2026stat.MEscore 0

A recurring debate in the philosophy of statistics concerns what, exactly, should count as a measure of evidence for or against a given hypothesis. P-values, likelihood ratios, and Bayes factors all have their defenders. In this paper we add two additional candidates to this list: the e-value and its sequential analogue, the e-process. E-values enjoy several desirable properties as measures of evidence: they combine naturally across studies, handle composite hypotheses, provide long-run error rates, and admit a useful interpretation as the wealth accrued by a bettor in a game against the…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2603.24421
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2603.24421/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2603.24421/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'