Open Research Index

Ranking Metrics: Extending Acceptability and Performance Indexes

Asmerilda Hitaj, Elisa Mastrogiacomo, Ilaria Peri, Marcelo Righi

arXivarxiv/2604.16438Apr 6, 2026q-fin.RMscore 0

This paper develops an axiomatic framework for ranking metrics, a general class of functionals for evaluating and ordering financial or insurance positions. Unlike traditional risk-adjusted performance measures-such as the Sharpe ratio, RAROC, or Omega-that express reward per unit of risk, ranking metrics assign each position a performance level rather than a normalized return. Relying on monotonicity and a new property called cash-quasiconcavity, we derive representation results linking ranking metrics to families of acceptance sets and risk measures, extending the theory of acceptability…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2604.16438
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2604.16438/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2604.16438/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'