When can a posterior predictive check identify the learning rate? Exact degeneracy in Gaussian models and implications for Generalised Bayesian Inerence
Generalised Bayesian inference tempers the likelihood by a learning rate $η$ to mitigate model misspecification, and the choice of $η$ is consequential. Zafar and Nicholls (2024) proposed selecting $η$ by a posterior predictive check (PPC): one chooses the smallest $η$ at which a log-likelihood PPC $p$-value is not rejected. An exact, finite-sample analysis of this selector on the Gaussian linear model is given. With known variance and a flat prior, the PPC $p$-value equals $P(χ^2_n > \mathrm{RSS}/σ_0^2)$ for every $η$, so the selector is $η$-invariant; under variance misspecification it is…
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2606.07169
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2606.07169/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2606.07169/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'