When Error Mitigation Makes Things Worse: Budget-Aware Evaluation, Extrapolation Failure, and the Calibration Trust Boundary

Guilin Zhang; Kai Zhao; Xiquan Cui; Henry Heng; Xu Chu; Aletta Johanna Blanken

When Error Mitigation Makes Things Worse: Budget-Aware Evaluation, Extrapolation Failure, and the Calibration Trust Boundary

Guilin Zhang, Kai Zhao, Xiquan Cui, Henry Heng, Xu Chu, Aletta Johanna Blanken

arXivarxiv/2609.38713Sep 30, 2026quant-phscore 0

Error mitigation is expected to turn noisy quantum measurements into more useful estimates. We show that it can instead amplify error. Under control-offset miscalibration, the evaluated unconstrained zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE) estimators are worse than no mitigation on 38-63% of simulated instances and produce extreme tail errors. A small IBM Heron study finds worsening on 80-88% of 18 instances across two depths, with mean error 3.0-4.1 times the raw error. In simulation, the median changes little, so median-only monitoring misses the failures. We then compare methods at the same online…

Source JSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.38713
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.38713/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.38713/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'