Cheap to Draw, Expensive to Trust: Certifying Test-Time Scaling Curves
Sampling several answers and keeping the one a verifier scores highest is one of the simplest ways to buy accuracy at test time. Its effect is reported as a scaling curve: accuracy against the number $k$ of sampled answers. The curve is cheap to draw and expensive to trust. A budget read off it is chosen after looking at every point, so only a band that covers all budgets at once protects the choice, and on a 100-question benchmark a fixed exact-binomial design needs 192,000 generated answers to certify 64 budgets to within $\pm1/32$ at 95%. Most of that cost pays for the wrong uncertainty.…
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.40190
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.40190/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2609.40190/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'