Logical gate set tomography

Piper C. Wysocki, Juan Gonzalez De Mendoza, Karl Mayer, Natalie C. Brown, Ciaran Ryan-Anderson, Jalan A. Ziyad, Jordan H. Hines, Daniel G. Hothem, Corey I. Ostrove, Timothy J. Proctor, Kevin C. Young, Robin J. Blume-Kohout, Charles H. Baldwin, Kenneth M. Rudinger

arXivarxiv/2610.19034Oct 13, 2026quant-phscore 0

Quantum error correction (QEC) can strongly suppress noise, but predicting whether a computation succeeds requires understanding not only how much effective noise persists after QEC, but what form that noise takes. To thoroughly characterize this noise, we introduce logical gate set tomography (``logical GST''). Logical GST produces detailed representations of noisy logical operations that can be used to derive higher-level metrics, such as gate fidelity and diamond distance, and to test for non-Markovian and coherent logical errors. We use logical GST to obtain the first full,…

SourceJSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.19034
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.19034/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2610.19034/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'